switching to lines would improve performance a good bit. the only problem with this is that you need to set the z appropriately so the lines dont connect where repeating.
see below for the fix for "day"
I love the color background heatmap... but I also feel like we have to explain what it is and that in some ways it makes it harder to notice what's going on with the ticks.
Options:
- drop the colored heatmap, because now it's in the "change your visual form" notebook.
- have checkboxes for the elements as shown here
- have an opacity slider just on the heatmap
- decide that it's fine as is w/ 0.3 opacity
- switch to magma (reversed) since then we get more out of the heatmap via the color shift & otherwise keep at 0.3 opacity
In the vein of keeping things as clean as possible, my vote would be to drop the heatmap here and just show ticks + mean.
And, then just link to the other notebook to go more into the more complex chart form & options.
Done (in a sec).
PS - in Plot below use x: {label: "Electricity Demand (MWh) →"} and keep the tickX using the "value" since we left in value below. I fixed below (the ticks had gotten lost).