Can you itemise and explain the 6 time series: cumVaccination etc!

Can Radu (or someone) add the indicative data?

You use the term *underlying factors* in the user story - can you use it again here to show that this is what you mean (if you do)!

Great! remove @Radu note!

The point really is to make reference to existing visualization research, so this loses a lot without adhering to that structure.

The text we have written here has been somewhat lost. Observable has not been very stable when editing collaboratively. Good that we worked on a separate document on Drive and had a copy. I think we should consider making copies of this Observable documents in a different format (e.g., as Markdown files and/or as pdf documents as a minimum). Observable doesn't really meet the requirements for a persistent resource, and it is a company, so a bit uneasy to save all our work here.

OK - thanks for raising this! To discuss ... post Sep 20!

It's really hard to make sense of this reflection without knowing what the thing is! Do complete this if you can!

How does "ordering/sorting" relate to visual conditioning? Not clear! we need the examples!

A lot of this is very abstract and it will be hard for a reader to work out what it means. E.g. "Relating individual level representations and group-level summaries are important in understanding member-class associations" I'm not at all sure what this means.

Renamed this as faceting and sorting, as it is a better reflection of this idiom.

IT'S NOT AT ALL CLEAR WHERE Spatially Correlated Small Multiples comes in. Is that the idiom? Fine if so, but explain it! If the idiom is not implemented and available or adequately described, that's a big deal - be clear about this!

There is no one single idiom we base this on. Spatially Correlated SM implements maybe some of this, so it is a relevant reference but not something we would base this wholly on.

Makes much more sense now - it is still pretty broad, but the reflection is really excellent!

Great! Very clear, specific and focussed!

Very nice! The result is a series of spatially ordered small multiples. I like the "Our approach" description - but will people know what conditioning and faceting are?

Great! Just what we need to show how this can be applied!

"In the following, we followed the following protocol". 😬

Great in many ways! Can you explain what the further VIS shows a little more? It's a nice example that helps, but feels a little bolt-in.

Done

It's a really rich section - do break it up into blocks if you can.

Eg - strip plot graphic could come after description. Can you add references for StripPlot and HeatMap? (these could have been valid idioms!)

Wow! An early use of stripplots in 1664 according to this bibliography here. Really impressive historical mini-review here - http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/bocode/s/stripplot.html : "There is not a sharp distinction in the literature or in software implementations between dot plots and strip plots. Commonly, but with many exceptions, a dot plot is drawn as a pointillist analogue of a histogram. Sometimes, dot plot is used as the name when data points are plotted in a line, or at most a narrow strip, against a magnitude axis. Strip plot implementations, as here, usually allow stacking options, so that dot plots may be drawn as one choice. Such plots under these and yet other names go back at least as far as Langren (1644): see Tufte (1997, p.15) and in much more detail Friendly et al. (2010). Sasieni and Royston (1996) and Wilkinson (1999) give general discussions and several further references of historical interest. Monkhouse and Wilkinson (1952) used the term dispersion diagrams. Pearson (1956) gives several examples. Dickinson (1963) used the term dispersal graphs. Box et al. (1978) used the term dot diagrams. Chambers et al. (1983), Becker et al. (1988) and Cleveland (1994) used the term one-dimensional scatter plots, as did Lee and Tu (1997) and Reimann et al. (2008). Ryan et al. (1985) discuss their Minitab implementation as dotplots. Cleveland (1985) used the term point graphs. The term oneway plots appears to have been introduced by Computing Resource Center (1985). Feinstein (2002, p.67) uses the term one-way graphs. The term strip plots (or strip charts) (e.g. Dalgaard 2002; Venables and Ripley 2002; Robbins 2005; Faraway 2005; Maindonald and Braun 2007) appears traceable to work by J.W. and P.A. Tukey (1990). The term dit plots appears in Ellison (1993, 2001). The term linear plots appears in Hay (1996) and that of line plots in Klemelä (2009) and Schenemeyer and Drew (2011). Tufte (1974), Berry (1996), Cobb (1998), Griffiths et al. (1998), Bland (2000), Wild and Seber (2000), Robbins (2005), Young et al. (2006), Morgenthaler (2007), Warton (2008) and Keen (2010) show many interesting examples of strip plots. Hybrid dot-box plots were used by Monkhouse and Wilkinson (1952), Gregory (1963), Matthews (1981), Wilkinson (1992, 2005), Wild and Seber (2000), Ellison (2001), Quinn and Keough (2002) and Young et al. (2006). Box plots in widely current forms are best known through the work of Tukey (1972, 1977). Similar ideas go back much further. Cox (2009) gives various references. Bibby (1986, pp.56, 59) gave even earlier references to their use by A.L. Bowley in his lectures about 1897 and to his recommendation (Bowley, 1910, p.62; 1952, p.73) to use minimum and maximum and 10, 25, 50, 75 and 90% points as a basis for graphical summary. Keen (2010) also discusses several variants of box plots. Dot charts (also sometimes called dot plots) in the sense of Cleveland (1984, 1994), as implemented in graph dot, are quite distinct. See also Cox (2004) for a general discussion of graphing distributions in Stata; Cox (2007) for an implementation of stem-and-leaf plots that bears some resemblance to what is possible with stripplot; and Cox (2009) on how to draw box plots using twoway. "

Interesting, useful. So we need to do more vis to understand its potential better?

Complete in full when you get the chance!

Make sure these are in the spreadsheet in BibTex format : Jianu, Radu and Turkay, Cagatay, ... Oh bloody hell, I am half way there - I'll do it. Jianu, Radu and Turkay, Cagatay and Vidal, Franck and Fang, Hui and Rahat, Alma and Nguyen, Phong and Gonen, Tuna

CT - Can you rephrase this? Poorly explained!

Good call, read pretty confusing. Tidied this up now.

A map of this would be very revealing ;)

Agreed. I've actually produced some maps but probably best placed in future work

It's easy to see similarities within clusters, but hard to compare clusters with this layout. You claim that "The more deprived areas seem to have longer first and second peaks" but this requires some mental gymnastics that you could really help with vertical alignment. Again, mapping would be helpful.

Good point, and some summary plots to communicate the characteristics of each cluster might have helped. Wish there was a bit more time.