You can get which dimensions are affected simply like this.

Yes, but since more than one dimension can be over 1, I didn't want them overlapping... I wanted to draw a mark only to the dots that represent the dimension that is being interacted with. That would show how a single dimension affects each ccaa, but it wouldn't leave an overview of all the weight changes.

Ha! Gotcha. It seems like an overkill tho, right? 😅

Definately... now it is working, I think it is useful to see how each dimension differs from the ccaa average, and which ccaas are the most negatively and positively affected by a change in their weight value. I don't like that it only shows that when interacting with the sliders though... To see this statically, a faceted plot could be useful but maybe too much

Also, I think that it is easier to follow how the ccaas change positions when this mark is drawn.

How about this @poldarder?

Much better!!

I think we only need to add some annotations over the slope chart and some nice-looking legend / key to explain this 😇

As for colors, should we only show a legend for the current color of the average (total) circle on each CCAA, or also one for the colors that are shown on the rules and circles that appear only when interacting with the sliders?

They all kind of mean the same, right? I don't think we need to be precise with the classes. Red is less, blue is more, or positive or negative, whatever. I added what I meant by adding a key.