2a:null 2b:["$","title",null,{"children":"Governing the Extremes: A Comparative Exploration of Top and Bottom 10 Countries in Global Governance (2012-2021) | Shiv-zz's Workspace | Observable"}] 30:T572,Here's my dataset considering SIX governance indicators over the time: - **Time**: This column represents the year of the data, range:2012-2021. - **Time Code**: Code or identifier associated with the respective year. - **Country Name**: This column contains the names of different countries. - **Country Code**: Country codes or abbreviations that uniquely identify each country. - **Control of Corruption(%)**: Percentage score related to the control of corruption within each country. It measures how well a country is able to prevent corruption. - **Government Effectiveness(%)**: Effectiveness of the government in each country, expressed as a percentage. - **Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism(%)**: The level of political stability and the absence of violence or terrorism in each country, measured as a percentage. - **Regulatory Quality(%)**:The quality of regulatory frameworks and practices within each country, represented as a percentage. - **Rule of Law(%)**: The extent to which the rule of law is upheld in each country, given as a percentage. - **Voice and Accountability(%)**: The degree to which citizens have a voice and can hold the government accountable in each country, expressed as a percentage. - **Average of All Governance Indicators(%)**: Average score calculated from the various governance indicators listed above, represented as a percentage. 31:T4fb,## Governance Indicator Treemaps: Contrasting Excellence and Challenges The treemaps represent the top 10 and bottom 10 countries based on average of all governance indicators. Each rectangular segment in the treemap corresponds to a country, with the size of the segment reflecting the relative magnitude of its governance indicator average. **Color Encoding:** The color scheme employs shades of green for the top 10 countries and shades of red for the bottom 10 countries. Intensity variations in the green hues signify higher governance indicator averages in the top countries, while increased intensity in the red hues indicates lower averages for the bottom countries. - Countries such as New Zealand, Switzerland, and Norway are notable for their extensive *green* segments, indicating high governance indicator averages (approaching 100). - The deeper shades of green suggest a higher degree of governance effectiveness in these top-performing countries. - Conversely, countries like Somalia, South Sudan, and Syria are prominently represented in *red* hues, denoting lower governance indicator averages (ranging from 1 to around 7). - The intensity of red communicates a comparatively lower degree of governance effectiveness in these bottom-performing countries. 32:Ta01,## Global Governance Pioneers: A Spotlight on Top 10 Countries *Dropdown: Select one country and visualize its indicators performance over the years.* 1. New Zealand: - Transparency and Low Corruption: New Zealand consistently ranks high in global corruption perception indices. Its transparent and corruption-free environment is facilitated by strong institutions and anti-corruption measures. 3. Switzerland: - Political Stability and Economic Prosperity: Switzerland is known for its political stability, which is conducive to economic prosperity. Its governance fosters a business-friendly environment, attracting global investments. 5. Norway: - Social Inclusivity and Wealth Distribution: Norway's governance is characterized by a commitment to social inclusivity. Policies promoting wealth distribution, strong social safety nets, and high-quality public services contribute to overall well-being. 7. Finland: - Education and Innovation: Finland places a strong emphasis on education and innovation. Its governance supports a robust education system, contributing to high literacy rates and a culture of innovation and research. 9. Luxembourg: - Financial Transparency and Economic Stability: Luxembourg's governance is marked by financial transparency and economic stability. It has sound financial regulations, attracting international businesses and contributing to economic growth. 11. Sweden: - Social Welfare Policies: Sweden's governance is known for its social welfare policies, providing citizens with comprehensive social benefits, healthcare, and education. This contributes to a high standard of living. 13. Denmark: - Government Effectiveness: Denmark scores high in government effectiveness, indicating efficient public administration. Its governance fosters a responsive and accountable government. 15. Liechtenstein: - Small, Responsive Government: Liechtenstein's small size allows for a more responsive government. Efficient governance, along with policies that attract financial services, contributes to its economic success. 17. Netherlands: - Infrastructure and Innovation: The Netherlands has a well-developed infrastructure and a culture that promotes innovation. Effective governance supports the country's position as a hub for international trade and technology. 19. Canada: - Rule of Law and Cultural Diversity: Canada's governance is characterized by a strong rule of law and a commitment to cultural diversity. Its institutions uphold legal frameworks that ensure a fair and just society. 33:T9bb,## Governance Struggles: Examining Challenges in the Bottom 10 Countries *Dropdown: Select one country and visualize its indicators performance over the years.* 1. Somalia: - Governance Challenges: Somalia faces significant governance challenges, evident in low rankings on global corruption perception indices. Weak institutions and insufficient anti-corruption measures contribute to a less transparent environment. 2. South Sudan: - Political Instability and Economic Struggles: South Sudan grapples with political instability, impacting economic prosperity. Governance challenges create a less business-friendly environment, hindering global investments. 3. Syrian Arab Republic: - Social Disruptions: The Syrian Arab Republic encounters governance issues amidst social disruptions. Conflict and political unrest contribute to challenges in wealth distribution and the provision of public services. 4. Yemen, Rep.: - Economic and Political Turmoil: Yemen faces economic and political turmoil, impacting wealth distribution and social safety nets. Governance challenges hinder the provision of high-quality public services. 5. Libya: - Political Fragmentation: Libya experiences governance challenges linked to political fragmentation. Financial transparency is affected, impacting economic stability and growth. 6. Sudan: - Governance Struggles: Sudan grapples with governance struggles, affecting social welfare policies. The lack of comprehensive social benefits contributes to challenges in achieving a high standard of living. 7. Congo, Dem. Rep.: - Political Instability and Economic Challenges: The Democratic Republic of Congo faces governance issues marked by political instability. Economic challenges impact government effectiveness and responsiveness. 8. Korea, Dem. People's Rep.: - Isolation and Government Effectiveness: The Democratic People's Republic of Korea encounters governance challenges due to isolation. Government effectiveness is hindered, impacting public administration. 9. Central African Republic: - Political and Economic Challenges: The Central African Republic faces governance challenges stemming from political and economic difficulties. A lack of responsiveness affects government effectiveness. 10. Eritrea: - Isolation and Limited Governance: Eritrea experiences governance challenges related to isolation. Limited government responsiveness contributes to economic struggles and challenges in social welfare policies.34:T5d6,{ // Assuming you have the TOP_GI data and years as mentioned in the previous example // Extract years and governance indicators const years = Array.from(new Set(data.map(d => d.Time))); const indicators = Object.keys(data[0]).filter(key => key !== 'Country_Name' && key !== 'Time'&& key !== 'Country Code' && key !== 'Time_Code' && key !== 'Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)'); // Create traces for each country const traces = TOP_GI.map(country => { const countryData = data.filter(d => d.Country_Name === country.countryName); const countryValues = indicators.map(indicator => { return { x: years, y: countryData.map(d => +d[indicator]), mode: 'lines+markers', name: `${country.countryName} - ${indicator}`, }; }); return countryValues; }).flat(); // Create layout with dropdown menu const layout = { xaxis: { title: 'Years' }, yaxis: { title: 'Governance Indicators' }, title: 'Governance Indicators Over Years for Top 10 Countries', updatemenus: [{ buttons: TOP_GI.map(country => ({ label: country.countryName, method: 'update', args: [ { visible: traces.map(trace => trace.name.includes(country.countryName)) }, { title: `Governance Indicators Over Years for ${country.countryName}` }, ], })), direction: 'down', showactive: true, x: 0.1, xanchor: 'left', y: 1.15, yanchor: 'top', }], }; // Plot the chart Plotly.newPlot('myPlot50', traces, layout); } 35:T5dc,{ // Assuming you have the TOP_GI data and years as mentioned in the previous example // Extract years and governance indicators const years = Array.from(new Set(data.map(d => d.Time))); const indicators = Object.keys(data[0]).filter(key => key !== 'Country_Name' && key !== 'Time'&& key !== 'Country Code' && key !== 'Time_Code' && key !== 'Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)'); // Create traces for each country const traces = BOTTOM_GI.map(country => { const countryData = data.filter(d => d.Country_Name === country.countryName); const countryValues = indicators.map(indicator => { return { x: years, y: countryData.map(d => +d[indicator]), mode: 'lines+markers', name: `${country.countryName} - ${indicator}`, }; }); return countryValues; }).flat(); // Create layout with dropdown menu const layout = { xaxis: { title: 'Years' }, yaxis: { title: 'Governance Indicators' }, title: 'Governance Indicators Over Years for Top 10 Countries', updatemenus: [{ buttons: BOTTOM_GI.map(country => ({ label: country.countryName, method: 'update', args: [ { visible: traces.map(trace => trace.name.includes(country.countryName)) }, { title: `Governance Indicators Over Years for ${country.countryName}` }, ], })), direction: 'down', showactive: true, x: 0.1, xanchor: 'left', y: 1.15, yanchor: 'top', }], }; // Plot the chart Plotly.newPlot('myPlot51', traces, layout); } 36:T542,## Divergent Trajectories: Governance Contrasts in Finland and Somalia The chart with the X-axis representing governance indicators and the Y-axis ranging from 0 to 100, with bars for Finland depicting extremely high values and bars for Somalia illustrating extremely low values, offers a striking visual contrast. - Finland's consistently high values across all governance indicators emphasize its exceptional performance and stability. This contrasts with Somalia's extremely low values pointing to pervasive political, institutional and development challenges. - The chart highlights a pronounced disparity between the two countries, with Finland nearing the maximum scores while Somalia plummets towards the minimums. Significance: - It underscores governance quality as a vital determinant of a country's progress and people's welfare, seen in the divergence between Finland and Somalia. - For Somalia and similarly struggling nations, it signals an urgent need for comprehensive interventions tackling instability, building institutional capacity, and providing humanitarian aid. - More broadly, the considerable governance gap between countries reinforces why effective governance structures are crucial for global development. It serves as a call to action for the international community to assist countries with very low indicators.37:T573,{ const dat = [ { countryName: 'Finland', 'Control_of_Corruption(%)': 99.5192337, 'Government_Effectiveness(%)': 99.03845978, 'Political_Stability_and_Absence_of_Violence/Terrorism(%)': 82.54717255, 'Regulatory_Quality(%)': 99.03845978, 'Rule_of_Law(%)': 100, 'Voice_and_Accountability(%)': 99.51690674 }, { countryName: 'Somalia', 'Control_of_Corruption(%)': 1.923076868, 'Government_Effectiveness(%)': 0.961538434, 'Political_Stability_and_Absence_of_Violence/Terrorism(%)': 1.415094376, 'Regulatory_Quality(%)': 2.884615421, 'Rule_of_Law(%)': 0.480769217, 'Voice_and_Accountability(%)': 1.932367206 } ]; // Extract indicators and values const indicators = Object.keys(dat[0]).filter(key => key !== 'countryName'); const countries = dat.map(d => d.countryName); // Create traces for each country const traces = countries.map((country, index) => ({ x: indicators, y: indicators.map(indicator => dat[index][indicator]), type: 'bar', name: country, marker: { color: index === 0 ? 'blue' : 'orange' } })); // Create layout const layout = { barmode: 'group', title: 'Governance Indicators Comparison: Finland vs Somalia (2020)', xaxis: { title: 'Indicators' }, yaxis: { title: 'Indicators Performance (%)', range: [0, 100] } }; // Plot the chart Plotly.newPlot('groupedBarChart', traces, layout); }38:T458,{ function createAreaChart(containerId, data, chartTitle) { // Extract country names and average governance indicators const countries = data.map(d => d.countryName); const averageValues = data.map(d => d.average); // Create a trace for the area chart const trace = { x: countries, y: averageValues, fill: 'tozeroy', type: 'scatter', mode: 'lines', line: { color: 'rgba(173, 216, 230, 0.7)' }, name: chartTitle, // Use the chartTitle as the trace name }; return trace; } // Separate data for top and bottom countries const topChart = createAreaChart('combinedGIAreaChart', TOP_GI, 'Top Countries Average Governance Indicators'); const bottomChart = createAreaChart('combinedGIAreaChart', BOTTOM_GI, 'Bottom Countries Average Governance Indicators'); // Create layout const layout = { xaxis: { title: 'Countries' }, yaxis: { title: 'Average Governance Indicators', range: [0, 100] }, title: 'Top and Bottom Countries Average Governance Indicators', }; // Plot the combined area chart Plotly.newPlot('combinedGIAreaChart', [topChart, bottomChart], layout); }39:T4ad,{ // Sample data for illustration, replace with your actual data const topCountries = ['NZL', 'CHE', 'NOR', 'FIN', 'LUX', 'SWE', 'DNK', 'LIE', 'NLD', 'CAN']; const bottomCountries = ['SOM', 'SSD', 'SYR', 'YEM', 'LBY', 'SDN', 'COD', 'PRK', 'CAF', 'ERI']; // Function to generate data for the world map function generateMapData(countryList, color, name) { return countryList.map(countryCode => ({ type: 'scattergeo', locationmode: 'ISO-3', locations: [countryCode], marker: { size: 12, opacity: 0.7, color: color, }, hoverinfo: 'text', text: countryCode, // Display individual country code in tooltip name: name, })); } // Combine data for top and bottom countries const mapData = [ ...generateMapData(topCountries, 'green', 'Top Countries'), ...generateMapData(bottomCountries, 'red', 'Bottom Countries'), ]; // Layout settings for the world map const layout = { geo: { projection: { type: 'natural earth', }, }, title: 'World Map Highlighting Governance Indicators', }; // Plot the world map Plotly.newPlot('worldMap', mapData, layout); }3a:T6a0,# To sum up... Here is a summary of my analysis by answering the key questions: - Ranking and Defining Standards: - The top performers with the highest average governance indicators are New Zealand, Switzerland, Norway, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, Denmark, Liechtenstein, Netherlands, and Canada. - The bottom performers with the lowest averages are Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo, North Korea, Central African Republic, and Eritrea. - Examining Differences in Core Indicators: - Top countries excel across all indicators like government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, accountability, etc. - Bottom countries struggle with corruption, political instability, ineffective administrations, economic turmoil, fragmentation, isolationism. - Evaluating Progress Over a 10-Year Period: - Countries with already high indicator scores reflect persistence at the maximum levels across metrics like government effectiveness, regulatory frameworks, and corruption controls. Meanwhile, countries grappling with poor governance exhibit a stagnancy towards the minimum levels across indicators throughout the period. This signals systemic challenges and crises - whether political instability, conflicts, ineffective administrations, or economic struggles - continue afflicting state capacity and service delivery. To maintain high governance, leaders must keep strengthening enablers. To improve poor governance, laggards must address root obstacles. Only then can lasting transformations happen, rather than temporary blips. The stagnation calls for customized interventions tackling why some sustain excellence, some remain stuck. 3b:[{"id":"c5178e4014ddb47f7ae80e80f7c5213db70dcd7564af897f2f4bc92d3ea481a219906abb4475ba3032a34518a254cb9b2e07ff7210afca16d0b2b71029ce6c43","href":"https://static.observableusercontent.com/files/c5178e4014ddb47f7ae80e80f7c5213db70dcd7564af897f2f4bc92d3ea481a219906abb4475ba3032a34518a254cb9b2e07ff7210afca16d0b2b71029ce6c43","name":"GovernanceIndicators-1 (1).csv","type":"text/csv","lastModified":1701973094562.865,"size":229879}] 2e:{"id":"89c5c71438ccbe6b","slug":"governing-the-extremes-a-comparative-exploration-of-top-an","title":"Governing the Extremes: A Comparative Exploration of Top and Bottom 10 Countries in Global Governance (2012-2021)","thumbnail":"26812ff6a64698b118c7fe3ce16314b93853fd8448eafa9e0e5c52602d1ff0a5","access_level":"public","create_time":"$D2023-12-07T18:17:59.695Z","update_time":"$D2024-03-09T21:16:41.991Z","view_time":null,"first_public_time":"$D2023-12-07T18:17:59.695Z","has_unpublished_edits":null,"fork":false,"stars":0,"starred":false,"owner":{"type":"team","id":"6e7015155a3f9b0b","login":"harishiv-zz-ws","name":"Shiv-zz's Workspace","avatar_url":"https://avatars-next.observableusercontent.com/7014a49220dde92cbb241fa6b11ea6245ccfb0402fe88aaf33bd01cab0c9c89e","tier":"starter_2024"},"version":360,"publish_version":null,"role":null,"authored":false,"authors":[{"type":"individual","id":"49576d670403ba18","login":"harishiv-zz","name":"Shiv-zz","avatar_url":"https://avatars-next.observableusercontent.com/de1b6ed913f644fd942a0ec73e4aa30da4bbc037f701cef5f26a1f90ff5cae21","tier":null}],"members":[{"type":"individual","id":"49576d670403ba18","login":"harishiv-zz","name":"Shiv-zz","avatar_url":"https://avatars-next.observableusercontent.com/de1b6ed913f644fd942a0ec73e4aa30da4bbc037f701cef5f26a1f90ff5cae21","tier":null,"role":"editor"},{"type":"team","id":"6e7015155a3f9b0b","login":"harishiv-zz-ws","name":"Shiv-zz's Workspace","avatar_url":"https://avatars-next.observableusercontent.com/7014a49220dde92cbb241fa6b11ea6245ccfb0402fe88aaf33bd01cab0c9c89e","tier":"starter_2024","role":"editor"}],"comments":[],"custom_thumbnail":false,"trashed":false,"lapsed":null,"subscribed":null,"forks":0,"collection":null,"type":"notebook","body":{"title":"Governing the Extremes: A Comparative Exploration of Top and Bottom 10 Countries in Global Governance (2012-2021)","cells":[{"id":0,"value":"# Governing the Extremes: A Comparative Exploration of Top and Bottom 10 Countries in Global Governance (2012-2021)","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":265,"value":"The vitality of good governance cannot be overstated, serving as a linchpin for a nation's economic and social prosperity. The World Bank captures the quality of countries' governance through Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), tracking things like government effectiveness, rule of law, and control of corruption. Spanning the years 2012 to 2021, this extended analysis of my project1 aims to unravel a deeper understanding of the governance landscape, emphasizing both exceptional performance and areas warranting critical attention.","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":267,"value":"$30","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":315,"value":"I aim to address these pivotal questions through my analysis:\n\n**1.\tRanking and Defining Standards:**\n- Question: Which nations emerge as the top performers in global governance, and conversely, which countries exhibit notable shortcomings or areas in need of improvement?\n \n**2.\tExamining Differences in Core Indicators:**\n- Question: What are the distinct governance indicators that differentiate top-performing nations from those facing challenges?\n \n**3.\tEvaluating Progress Over a 10-Year Period:**\n- Question: How have individual governance indicators and overall governance quality evolved in selected nations over the course of the past decade?\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":21,"value":"groupedData_GI = d3.group(data, d => d['Country_Name']); // groups the data by the unique 'Country_Name' values.","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":30,"value":"TOP_GI = Array.from(groupedData_GI, ([countryName, countryData]) => {\n const average = d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)']);\n return { countryName, average };\n}).sort((a, b) => b.average - a.average).slice(0,10); //Descending Sort","pinned":false,"hidden":true,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":25,"value":"BOTTOM_GI = Array.from(groupedData_GI, ([countryName, countryData]) => {\n const average = d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)']);\n return { countryName, average };\n}).sort((a, b) => a.average - b.average).slice(0,10); //Ascending Sort\n","pinned":false,"hidden":true,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":293,"value":"$31","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":33,"value":"html`

`","pinned":true,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":34,"value":"html`

`","pinned":true,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":36,"value":"Plotly.newPlot('treemap', [{\n type: 'treemap',\n labels: TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.countryName),\n parents: Array(TOP_GI.length).fill(''),\n values: TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average.toFixed(2)),\n marker: {\n colorscale: 'Greens',\n reversescale: true, // Use a boolean value\n cmin: Math.min(...TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average)),\n cmax: Math.max(...TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average)),\n colorbar: {\n tickvals: [Math.min(...TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average)), 2, Math.max(...TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average))],\n ticktext: [Math.min(...TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average)).toFixed(2), '2', Math.max(...TOP_GI.map(entry => entry.average)).toFixed(2)],\n tickmode: 'array',\n tickangle: -45,\n },\n },\n textinfo: 'label+value',\n}], {\n margin: { t: 40, l: 0, r: 0, b: 0 },\n title: {\n text: 'TOP 10 Countries by Governance Indicators',\n x: 0.5,\n },\n showlegend: false,\n hoverinfo: 'label+value',\n});\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":38,"value":"Plotly.newPlot('treemap2', [{\n type: 'treemap',\n labels: BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.countryName),\n parents: Array(BOTTOM_GI.length).fill(''),\n values: BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average.toFixed(2)),\n marker: {\n colorscale: 'Reds',\n reversescale: true,\n cmin: Math.min(...BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average)),\n cmax: Math.max(...BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average)),\n colorbar: {\n tickvals: [Math.min(...BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average)), 2, Math.max(...BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average))],\n ticktext: [Math.min(...BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average)).toFixed(2), '2', Math.max(...BOTTOM_GI.map(entry => entry.average)).toFixed(2)],\n tickmode: 'array',\n tickangle: -45,\n },\n },\n textinfo: 'label+value',\n}], {\n margin: { t: 40, l: 0, r: 0, b: 0 },\n title: {\n text: 'BOTTOM 10 Countries by Governance Indicators',\n x: 0.5,\n },\n showlegend: false,\n hoverinfo: 'label+value',\n});\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":307,"value":"$32","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":40,"value":"html`

`","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":310,"value":"$33","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":42,"value":"html`

`","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":46,"value":"$34","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":48,"value":"$35","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":50,"value":"{\n // Assuming you have the data structure with 'Time' and 'Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)'\n\n// Extract years and average governance indicators\nconst years = Array.from(new Set(data.map(d => d.Time)));\nconst averageValues = years.map(year => {\n const yearData = data.filter(d => d.Time === year);\n const average = d3.mean(yearData, d => +d['Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)']);\n return average;\n});\n\n// Create a trace for the area chart\nconst trace = {\n x: years,\n y: averageValues,\n fill: 'tozeroy', // 'tozeroy' fills the area below the line\n type: 'scatter',\n mode: 'lines',\n line: { color: 'rgba(173, 216, 230, 0.7)' }, // Specify line color and transparency\n name: 'Average Governance Indicators',\n};\n\n// Create layout\nconst layout = {\n xaxis: { title: 'Years' },\n yaxis: { title: 'Average Governance Indicators', range: [0, 100] }, // Set Y-axis range\n title: 'Average Governance Indicators Over Years',\n};\n\n// Plot the area chart\nPlotly.newPlot('myPlot52', [trace], layout);\n\n}\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":125,"value":"BOTTOM_GI_2 = Array.from(groupedData_GI, ([countryName, countryData]) => {\n const average = d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Average_of_All_Governance_Indicators(%)']);\n return {\n countryName,\n average,\n 'Control_of_Corruption(%)': d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Control_of_Corruption(%)']),\n 'Government_Effectiveness(%)': d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Government_Effectiveness(%)']),\n 'Political_Stability_and_Absence_of_Violence/Terrorism(%)': d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Political_Stability_and_Absence_of_Violence/Terrorism(%)']),\n 'Regulatory_Quality(%)': d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Regulatory_Quality(%)']),\n 'Rule_of_Law(%)': d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Rule_of_Law(%)']),\n 'Voice_and_Accountability(%)': d3.mean(countryData, d => +d['Voice_and_Accountability(%)']),\n };\n}).sort((a, b) => a.average - b.average).slice(0, 10); // Ascending Sort\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":303,"value":"$36","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":169,"value":"html`

`","pinned":true,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":167,"value":"$37","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":240,"value":"$38","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":305,"value":"# Regional concentration of top and bottom governance indicators\n- Many European countries like those in Switzerland, Netherlands and Luxembourg are concentrated among the top rankings for governance indicators globally.\n- Oceania has top performers like New Zealand while North America is represented by Canada in the top governance indicators group.\n- In contrast, several African countries including Somalia, South Sudan and Sudan have very low governance indicator scores, concentrated among the bottom group globally.\n- The Middle East, represented by conflict-afflicted nations like Syria and Yemen, and Asia with North Korea are also concentrated more in the bottom governance rankings.\n- This distribution highlights varied regional dynamics - while some continents host many countries with strong quality of governance, others grapple with more systemic governance issues.","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":259,"value":"html`

`","pinned":true,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":255,"value":"$39","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":297,"value":"# A decade of stagnation:\nConsistently high governance indicators in top countries may stem from stable institutions, economic prosperity, investments in education, and a culture of ethical behavior. Meanwhile, consistently low indicators in bottom countries may be linked to political instability, economic challenges, corruption, and limited access to education and healthcare. These patterns reflect the impact of factors such as stability, economic prosperity, and cultural values on governance outcomes. Addressing issues like conflict, corruption, and economic struggles is crucial to breaking the cycle of stagnant governance indicators in bottom countries and fostering sustained improvements.\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":44,"value":"html`

`\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":235,"value":"html`

`","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":347,"value":"$3a","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"md","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"","database":"$undefined"},{"id":5,"value":"d3 = require(\"d3@7\")","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":8,"value":"import { addTooltips } from \"@mkfreeman/plot-tooltip\"\n\n","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":10,"value":"Plotly = require(\"https://cdn.plot.ly/plotly-latest.min.js\")","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":23,"value":"data = FileAttachment(\"GovernanceIndicators-1 (1).csv\").csv()","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":4,"value":"import {Legend} from \"@d3/color-legend\"","pinned":false,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"},{"id":358,"value":"","pinned":true,"hidden":false,"mode":"ojs","author":"$undefined","summary":"$undefined","output":"$undefined","database":"$undefined"}],"files":"$W3b","stdlib":"1","titling":"auto"}} 2f:"$2e:body"