- "the" before "Chat GPT language model? - I think it's ChatGPT without a space - The benefits sentence is a little awkward. I would revise it to: "AI Assist accelerates the notebook development process by helping you write SQL and JavaScript, fix errors, and explain how code works, to break through development obstacles."

This should be "AI Assist" section.

We may want to add that there is both cost and accuracy implications between the two models. 3.5-Turbo is significantly cheaper, but it also is only around 80% (don't quote me) as accurate as GPT-4. Therefore users should choose a model according to their budget and needs.

It's 40% more likely to respond accurately: "40% more likely to produce factual responses than GPT-3.5 on our internal evaluations."

Typos: "GTP", "gtp-4", "gtp3.5-turbo-16k"

Should we phrase it as asking a question of ChatGPT or AI Assist here? Seems like AI Assist, unless we're talking about the specifics of the model itself.

Same question about using "ChatGPT" vs. "AI Assist" above.

Sorry, this is another hangover from the early development of this feature that didn't make it into the internal docs. There are actually only two personas right now, General Chat, and SQL. General Chat automatically has Plot and Observable documentation injected. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions.

Per my comment above, we just need to merge this paragraph into the one above.

Do we want to indicate that by sharing your schema, it allows AI Assist to write complex SQL, including joins?

Also, what are your thoughts about having a section with prompt ideas, known issues/limitations, etc.?

Should say "bring your own OpenAI API key" right?

this figure and the figures below have the same caption duplicated

the question "how many 3 cylinder cars are there?" suggests, that AI assist will give the answer. But on the screenshots below the question is different: "how do I get the number of cars with 3 cylinders".