I really don’t know what to do with this one. It feels so Meta! “Meanwhile, we also conducted organised theoretical discourse on idioms in order to transform our experience to new theoretical advances” This is exactly what the paper is trying to do, so having an idiom on this seems unnecessary. There is enough in here to write a full paper - and this is in many ways what this paper was supposed to be. I can’t work out how to fit it in. And we have to send the final draft out tonight! I think we have to leave this for another paper. Original comments apply and follow. —- I am not convinced that this fits the model well, but we do need to use these arguments in the paper. Can we drop the idiom and use the perspectives elsewhere as we argue for more explicit and better developed vis knowledge that builds on theoretical advances and applied experience as we have done in this project?

Notebooks are essentially notebooks of the authors. I have been assessing students' labbooks/logbooks for the past three years. When I assess students' labbooks / logbooks, I usually place my trust on students in terms of the relevance of the content. Anyway, I have added more comments.