I would add tooltips for all regions, even when the corresponding intervention level is not checked. I would also add tooltips to indigenous lands.

I also think it is strange for the indigenous lands to be a filled-in gray. I think they would work better as an outline, with a light fill or a hatch, so that users can see what's underneath them.

Finally, the tooltips of the slaughterhouses could be added in the same line as the other tooltips, and not displayed at the bottom of the map. I think the way they're displayed right now is a bit confusing.

About the tooltips for all regions: I found it challenging to add tooltips for regions filtered out on the map. I suppose it is fine to keep it this way, because the “Select the pasture intervention level:” option has the five levels of pasture intervention. If users select all levels of intervention, they will see the tooltips for all municipalities; About tooltips for indigenous lands and grey filled colour: We had to use a filled colour to block this area because PCI team believe it is critical to hide these areas as a way to show that no land use should be implied on indigenous lands. I didn’t add a tooltip for indigenous lands because it is not relevant for this context (no decisions for indigenous lands). Users should only be aware that these lands are out of scope. Let me know if you still thing it’s relevant to add tooltip to indigenous lands? Tooltip for slaughterhouses: I changed the chart code to place the slaughterhouse’s tooltip close to their locations. I’m using a different design to avoid confusion with the major municipality tooltip. Let me know if is it ok to keep it like this? PS.: I changed the colour scheme to represent exported volume (Trase Greens) according to Trase guidelines.